Beyond building more: what we heard about grids at New York Climate Week

Grids were talked about everywhere at New York Climate Week this year. Across conversations there was broad agreement that electricity systems are struggling to keep pace with what we are asking of them. Power supply, dominated by solar and wind, is growing. Electrification is increasing. New industries and data centres are adding demand. Growing economies need more electricity, while governments are also thinking differently about energy security. That was particularly striking at the UN/COP31 and IEA high-level event on Electrification. Speakers came back to grids, whether through the lens of modernisation, flexibility and storage, resilience, capacity or energy security. The underlying message was remarkably consistent: greater electrification depends on strengthening the electricity system around it.  

All of this puts new pressure on grids. But across the week, three issues stood out to me about what it will actually take to respond.

Panel from GGC Crux event at New York Climate Week 2026 standing together

1. The grid is infrastructure. The challenge is a system.
This was the starting point for a conversation GGC convened with Crux Alliance, bringing together perspectives from Europe, the US, India and Southeast Asia. We wanted to explore what gets missed when the grid conversation focuses only on building infrastructure. What came through in that discussion was how differently the same grid challenge plays out across markets. The constraints may differ, but the common thread was coordination: infrastructure, planning, regulation, markets and flexibility cannot be treated as separate problems.  

A transmission line can be built, but planning determines whether it arrives in the right place and at the right time. Batteries and other flexible resources can help manage the system, but markets and regulation determine how effectively they are used. Renewable generation can be ready to connect while facing years of delay because the network or connection process is not ready for it.  

These problems are connected. Yet generation, transmission and distribution are still too often planned separately, while regulators, utilities, system operators, governments, developers and investors work to different mandates, incentives and timelines. Building infrastructure is essential. But getting ahead of demand also means improving how the whole system is planned and operated.  

2. Capital and projects need to meet

Financing came up repeatedly during the week, and the conversations exposed a familiar tension. Investors point to a shortage of investable projects. Developers point to a shortage, or high cost, of available capital. Both sides of that equation matter. That question was explicit at a roundtable on mobilising long-term capital for grid and renewable energy infrastructure, convened by the Green Grids Initiative, UNEZA, IRENA and Accenture. The conversation reinforced that the challenge is not simply the overall availability of capital, but creating the conditions in which investment can actually move into grid projects. The more useful question is what prevents viable projects and available capital from finding each other. Missing data, uncertain revenue models, regulatory risk, weak project preparation and underdeveloped pipelines can all make otherwise necessary investments difficult to finance.  

This is an area where philanthropy can play a useful role. It cannot, and should not, try to finance the grid itself. But it can work earlier in the process: improving planning and data, strengthening institutions, supporting project development, testing new approaches and addressing specific risks that make investment harder. Done well, relatively limited philanthropic funding can help create the conditions for much larger flows of public and private capital.  

3. Don’t forget coordination and consumers

There were also some notable gaps in the week's conversations. Transmission received plenty of attention. Distribution received less. Grid operations less still. And consumers were surprisingly absent. That pattern was noticeable across discussions ranging from investment and grid modernisation to flexibility and renewable integration. The technology and infrastructure questions were prominent; the question of how all those pieces work together, and what they ultimately mean for electricity users, was much less visible. That matters because the success of the grid transition will ultimately be felt beyond the electricity system itself: in whether households have reliable and affordable electricity, whether businesses can connect and grow, and whether power systems can respond to changing patterns of demand.  

At the end of our GGC & Crux discussion, I reflected on some of the words I had heard repeatedly during the week: scale, resilience, flexibility, storage, affordability and energy security. I would add two more: coordination and consumers.  

Grid transformation spans planning, markets, regulation, operations, flexibility, infrastructure and investment. New York showed just how much attention grids are now receiving. The next challenge is making sure these different pieces move together, and that we keep sight of who the system ultimately needs to serve. And there was a rather fitting reminder of how far electricity systems have come just next door to our hotel: a bust of Nikola Tesla outside the St. Sava Serbian Orthodox Cathedral. More than a century after his work helped lay the foundations for the modern electricity system, we are once again having to rethink how that system works.  

That is where GGC intends to focus.